Talk:Brake fluid

Automobiles Mid‑importance

	Cars portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chemistry Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Engineering Mid‑importance

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Yunnan

The road sign in Yunnan is a bad example. There are two terms for brake fluid, 制动液 being the formal one, 刹车油 is informal but common. So the 刹车水 on that sign is most likely used literally -- meaning the cooling water for the brakes on heavy trucks. Truck drivers who work on mountain roads often install (commercial or improvised) water cooling device to prevent brake overheating. It consists of a water tank, a valve, and hoses dripping water onto the brakes. This also makes better sense because you don't lose brake fluid during a long descent but you may need a lot of cooling water for that 38km! 112.95.200.77 (talk) 05:33, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

USDoT and DOT

The article makes no sense, why would the USDoT be the body that standarised brake fluid world wide? Its not reference or explained which leads me to believe its not true.(Morcus (talk) 13:30, 1 October 2008 (UTC))[reply]

the US DOT standards have widely been adopted worldwide because the USA was the first country with lots of cars. They already had standards in place and other countries followed. Anywhere you go in the world, automobiles use DOT brake fluid.

Service and Maintenance

The Service and Maintenance section states "As a general rule, brake fluids with different DOT ratings should not be mixed, although all DOT fluid is compatible, (this is part of the DOT specification)." I do not see where all DOT fluid is compatible in the DOT spec (reference found on the DOT 5 wiki page). The DOT 5 wiki page referenced in this article states "Using DOT 5 in a DOT 3 or DOT 4 system without proper flushing will cause damage to the seals and cause brake failure." If the information in this article is innaccurate, it could be quite dangerous. Terryjft (talk) 02:02, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you had read the entire article you'd see that you've misunderstood that. DOT 5 is NOT compatible with other fluids. Dot 3, 4, and 5.1 fluids can mix without an issue. Since the dry boiling point on DOT 3 is higher than the wet boiling point on dot 5.1, you could theoretically use DOT 3 fluid temporarily on a DOT 5.1 spec system without a problem. They're all glycol based and have no issues mixing. I can't link you to the stuff but I've been a mechanic for 20 years.

The "Service and maintenance" section needs to be rewritten or removed. It appears to have been written by someone with limited experience and the content isn't relevant to the article.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Brake fluid. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:51, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merger

There are separate articles for DOT 3, DOT 4, DOT 5, and DOT 5.1 - did I miss any? These are largely copies of eachother with small changes, and duplicate information already in this article. They should all be merged here, which would mean little more than converting them to redirects. Lithopsian (talk) 19:47, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support: They are essentially the same paragraph and the same table. Merge them all back to the parent article. Stepho talk 23:18, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support Andy Dingley (talk) 23:19, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support convert them to redirects. Created DOT 2 in mean-time. Widefox; talk 07:39, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merged. Feel free to work on it, or re-add any little snippets I might have missed. Andy Dingley (talk) 09:23, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

We are a company that would like to manufacture DOT3/DOT4 brake fluid. Can we help with chemical structures and ratios?

We are a company that would like to manufacture DOT3/DOT4 brake fluid. Can we help with chemical structures and ratios? 2A01:9700:1AD0:8600:B4EA:39D8:5C1E:B723 (talk) 15:50, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]